By Austin Tymins
In Arizona State’s 78-72 win over Colorado, the Buffalo players lining up for free throws were treated to the sight of two students dressed up as unicorns aggressively kissing as a packed student section (the 942 crew) loudly cheered on. This unusual disruption is part of Coach Herb Sendek’s “Curtain of Distraction” in which a curtain is drawn to reveal a confusing, and often disturbing scene in the student section behind the backboard. My personal favorites are a Miley Cyrus wrecking ball, shirtless cowboys playing guitar, a bear and lumberjack having a deathmatch, and a choreographed dance with Santa and his elves. To better understand what is going on, watch this video (you won’t regret it).
Since visiting teams only directly face the student section in the 2nd half, we can easily see if the stunt has an effect. On the face of it, it seems so. Teams shoot 68.6% in the 1st half and 60.6% in the 2nd half on free throws, while there is not a detectable difference in FT% between the 1st and 2nd half nationally. In the table below, we can see how each opponent has performed at the line against the Sun Devils at home.
This difference doesn’t tell the whole picture, so I’m going to conduct a two sample proportion test to see if this effect is statistically significant. The Z-score on this test is only 1.118 yielding the p-value of .131 in a one-tail test and .263 in a two-tail test, meaning this effect is not significant using either test. However, if we assume the two proportions will remain constant for the rest of the season, the larger sample size may reveal a significant result. My best estimate produces a Z-score of 1.74 meaning the effect is significant at the 10% level in a two-tail test and is significant at the 5% level doing a one-tail test.
Assistant Athletic Director Bill Kennedy says the Curtain of Distraction helps win games and is “worth about two-and-a-half points a game for us”. Is this actually the case? The NCAA average number of free throws shot by a team per game is 20.8 though there are more free throws shot in the 2nd half than the 1st. For example, 35% of ASU opponent free throws are shot in the 1st half while 65% are shot in the 2nd half. Therefore, ASU opponents are expected to shoot 13.42 free throws per game while facing the Curtain of Distraction assuming an average foul rate. This allows us to conclude the Curtain of Distraction is worth approximately 1.41 points per game.
Is it just me or (on average) does the actual FT% actually go up in the 2nd half (when the visiting team is at that end of the court) in 7 out of the 13 games!!! More than half had favorable results… Did the Harvard College Sports Analysis Collective not realize this before posting this article? Don’t believe me, take a look at their own chart in the article. It is actually helping the visiting team improve their shooting percentage in more games than it is hurting them (ie-7 improved, only 6 shot worse…)
Did you not read the article. Typical Wildcat not understanding basic percentages.
The Curtain of Distraction is something else alright! Want to say their a great sixth man. Unfortunately the team is so bad that the Curtain is more the first man. Hate to be a starter and officially the sixth man at the same time. I think Sparky may be the second man.
Bear Down all of Arizona but a little sad piece that roots for ASU.
Thank you for published because I have been learn a lot of knowledge.