NBA Franchise Valuations: The Business of Basketball

By Austin Tymins

As a result of the Donald Sterling controversy, the Los Angeles Clippers went up for sale in what quickly descended into a bidding war. Former Microsoft executive Steve Ballmer ended up with the highest bid for the team for a record-setting $2 billion. However, the most recent valuation done by Forbes magazine only had the Clippers listed at $575 million.

The price of NBA franchises in recent years skyrocketed, a phenomenon that can be attributed to two primary reasons. First, the new Collective Bargaining Agreement reached in the 2011 strike-shortened season has dramatically improved profit margins for teams (at the expense of players and the 2011 season). Second, local TV revenue has risen steeply as sporting events represent one of the few types of television programming still predominantly watched live—and therefore valuable to advertisers—and the Clippers current TV contract is up for renewal in 2016.

The owners of sports franchises often say they plan to run their teams “like a business”. However, as we can see from these graphs below, the NBA is particularly expensive business to be in. In the first graph I have plotted the 30 teams of the NBA with the 30 largest companies on the Dow Jones. As expected, the largest companies in the country dwarf the franchises of the NBA (shown on a log scale).

A commonly used metric in stock investing known as the price-earings ratio (or P/E ratio) can be applied to NBA franchises to measure relative value. A high P/E ratio is typical of a company that is expecting high earnings growth in the future, or one that is overvalued. In the histogram below, we see that the vast majority of NBA franchises have significantly higher P/E ratios than the companies of the Dow Jones. It is important to note that some NBA teams were excluded because of negative earnings while none of the Dow companies had negative earnings. The histogram below uses the Forbes Valuation for the price.

Screen Shot 2014-07-30 at 3.46.58 PMForbes had the Clippers listed for $575 million before they were sold for $2 billion, or 3.478 times more than predicted. For the next histogram, I applied the Clippers’ valuation multiple to every team in the league to come up with a rough estimate of P/E ratios in the NBA. This is equivalent to multiplying every Forbes Value by 3.478, which is surely a vast over-approximation. This is what the new valuations and P/E ratios would look like.

Team New Value ($mil)
Atlanta Hawks

1,478

Boston Celtics

3,043

Brooklyn Nets

2,713

Charlotte Bobcats

1,426

Chicago Bulls

3,478

Cleveland Cavaliers

1,791

Dallas Mavericks

2,661

Denver Nuggets

1,722

Detroit Pistons

1,565

Golden State Warriors

2,609

Houston Rockets

2,695

Indiana Pacers

1,652

Los Angeles Clippers

2,000

Los Angeles Lakers

4,695

Memphis Grizzlies

1,576

Miami Heat

2,678

Milwaukee Bucks

1,409

Minnesota Timberwolves

1,496

New Orleans Pelicans

1,461

New York Knicks

4,869

Oklahoma City Thunder

2,052

Orlando Magic

1,948

Philadelphia 76ers

1,631

Phoenix Suns

1,965

Portland Trail Blazers

2,042

Sacramento Kings

1,913

San Antonio Spurs

2,295

Toronto Raptors

1,809

Utah Jazz

1,826

Washington Wizards

1,722

Although NBA teams don’t typically publish their financial information, it is possible to use operating income as a starting point to estimate earnings. Looking just at estimated earnings, we see that NBA franchises are vastly overvalued. Below is a graph comparing the 30 NBA franchises’ P/E Ratio to that of the 30 largest firms on the DOW. The Clippers’ P/E ratio is 205.13, a number considerably higher than even a high growth stock like Netflix (NFLX).Screen Shot 2014-07-30 at 3.47.18 PM According to only relative valuation metrics, Ballmer’s purchase looks absurd. However, the team’s appreciation when Ballmer decides to sell the team could very well make the purchase profitable. Sterling bought the team in 1981 for $12.5 million, and since then its value has appreciated by 15,900%. This works out to a 17.8% compounded annual growth rate, far better than the 11.2% the S&P 500 grew over the same period. While this growth is certainly remarkable, it will likely slow down considerably well before we start to see $100 billion NBA franchises.

About the author

harvardsports

View all posts

1 Comment

  • This is a surprising result, I would’ve thought that the Lakers would have been worth the most money. I guess there is a lot of history around the Knicks and New York is a big market. It is good to know the value of teams before looking to invest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *